Tuesday 12 April 2011

Children and Women in Crisis

Millions of children and women in Pakistan had their lives forever marked by flooding in July and August 2010, one of the worst natural disasters of the past decades in terms of the population, land area, number of households and social infrastructure affected. Unusually heavy monsoon rains that were part of an anomalous weather pattern across Asia caused the Indus River to overflow its banks, submerging one-fifth of Pakistan’s land area at the peak of the flooding.1  More than 20 million people were affected, 7 million lost their homes, and an entire agrarian economy and way of life was altered. Six million boys and girls were severely affected. This extreme emergency, however, was only the most visible of the humanitarian crises of 2010. In northern Pakistan, a landslide in January obliterated a village and dammed up the Hunza River, creating a lake that swallowed up the surrounding villages, affecting some 40,000 people. In north-western Pakistan, more than 1.2 million people remained displaced following the 2009–2010 conflict. Pakistani families are experiencing a bewildering array of humanitarian needs rooted in ongoing instability, temporary displacement and widespread poverty. The key challenges for mounting an effective humanitarian response include frequent population movements and an insufficient number of partners able to assist the most vulnerable populations.

allvoices

Britain's Muslim schools to conduct own inspections

Private Muslim schools have been given the power to police themselves, despite widespread fears over religious segregation, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

In a controversial move, they have won the right to appoint their own Ofsted-style inspectors. A new independent watchdog has been set up to be more "sensitive'' toward Islamic education.

Proponents say faith schools need specialist inspectors
The decision comes despite concerns some private Muslim schools are already failing to prepare pupils for life in modern Britain.

Barry Sheerman, the chairman of the Commons schools select committee, told MPs last month local councils were finding it "difficult to know what is going on in some faith schools - particularly Muslim schools".

But religious leaders defended the move, saying the curriculum and religious traditions in faith schools demand specialist knowledge.

Under present legislation, most state and private schools are inspected by Ofsted, the Government's standards watchdog. The Association of Muslim Schools and the Christian Schools' Trust applied to the Government to set up a separate inspectorate for a small number of private faith schools.

advertisementThe Daily Telegraph has learned the Department for Children, Schools and Families [DCSF] approved plans for the Bridge Schools' Inspectorate last week, giving it the power to inspect about 60 private Muslim schools and 50 Christian schools.

Ofsted will still regularly vet the new inspectorate, but the move has been criticised.

Baroness Massey, the Labour peer, said any decision to set up separate inspection bodies would "reinforce differences and divisions" between religious groups.

Last night Mr Sheerman described the move as "very worrying".

Michael Gove, the shadow children's secretary, said the Tories supported faith schools for parents who want them. "It's important, however, to ensure that we build a society which is cohesive and make a success of diverse Britain."

"This is not the first time we have approved an independent inspectorate," said a spokesman for the DCSF.

"The new Education and Skills Bill currently passing through Parliament will increase the transparency of the process of approving independent inspectorates. It will ensure that in future no inspectorate is single faith."

He said this would help to promote integration.

allvoices

Muslim women face 'crisis' over violence: UN official


Muslim women around the world are facing a ‘growing crisis’ as Islamic governments fail to honour commitments to end inequality and violence against them, a senior UN official has warned.
Yakin Erturk, the UN's rapporteur on violence against women, said at a weekend conference that women must demand their governments carry out pledges to grant equal rights and ensure their safety.
"There is no time left to lose any more as this is a growing crisis," she told AFP after a speech which dealt with the issue at an international conference on "Equality and Justice in the Muslim Family."
"Women must demand that their governments implement agreements on women's equality, rights and an end to violence against women, which have been signed but have yet to be carried out," she said.
"In these countries, those who speak on behalf of Islam still justify things like stoning or killing a woman for this or that reason as being part of their religion. I have heard this at the most official of levels," Erturk said without specifying which countries were to blame.

allvoices

Help Women in Pakistan Survive and Rebuild

The United Nations has rated the current flooding in Pakistan as the greatest humanitarian crisis in recent history. Twenty million people and over one-fifth of the country's area are affected by rising floodwaters. Already, more people are impacted by the Pakistan floods than were affected by the Southeast Asian tsunami and the recent earthquakes in Kashmir and Haiti combined.  Militant groups are providing relief to survivors and complicating efforts by humanitarian organizations and governments.  And the record monsoon rains continue to fall.
MADRE's ally organization in the region, Shirkat Gah, has been working tirelessly with local communities in the hardest-hit areas to provide relief. Shirkat Gah was one of the first organizations to send field teams to help identify where large groups of displaced people had temporarily settled. They were able to dispatch mobile health units and distribute thousands of packages containing medicines, cooking supplies and a week’s worth of food for a family of six. They were also able to dispatch boats to rescue flood survivors trapped on rooftops and in trees.
Women are the most vulnerable to abuse, neglect, or oversight. MADRE's allies in the region are focusing on women's specific needs, and making sure those that have been overlooked are accounted for.  
You can help Shirkat Gah continue its vital work for women and children affected by the floods in Pakistan.  The crisis may fade from the news, but it's not over.  Help MADRE send funds to Shirkat Gah today.  Or, urge President Obama to increase US aid to Pakistan

allvoices

Stop Violence Against Women Protest


allvoices

Sunday 10 April 2011

Women of Kashmir

Kashmiri muslim women mourn during a funeral of a religious leader Moulana Shoukat Ahmad Shah in Srinagar.


allvoices
DERAGHAZIKHAN: Students stand at stall on the second day of three-day Meena Bazaar at Government Girls Degree College.


allvoices
HYDERABAD: A craftswoman busy in preparing the different clay-made stuff at her workplace.

allvoices

We must never forget the Taliban horror



Saying "troops out of Afghanistan now" is based on shocking levels of short memory. How is letting the Taliban death-cult in through the back door supposed to be progressive and left-wing?

This blog has always unequivocally opposed the Iraq war and its mismanagement. Afghanistan, however, offers a radically different picture.

The recent US air-strike and the controversy over the number of civilian casualties in the province of Farah have reminded the world that thousands of Western troops are still bogged down in that country and that no end is in sight.

However, it would be difficult to deny that if NATO troops left Afghanistan tomorrow, it would probably take five minutes for the whole country to be regained by the Taliban. For some people, this isn't our problem.

Sure, "liberated" Afghanistan is still struggling with deeply entrenched misogynism and a terrifying series of problems. But as much as each US air-strike going wrong may feel like a disgrace and more should be done to avoid civilian casualties, it is also impossible to feel any sympathy for the supporters of a regime who made "WE LOVE DEATH MORE THAN YOU DO LIFE" their call to arms.

The Taliban regime that held Afghanistan hostage between 1996 and 2001 is possibly one of the most disgusting ones in living memory. Drenched in ideology, its basic tenet was an utmost state of paranoia and obsession with vice and virtue that were used to justify a mind-boggling series of prohibitions. Life in Taliban Afghanistan must have felt like the Invasion of the Body Snatchers, a succession of people pointing the finger at other people the other side of the road, shouting that they were not "pure and virtuous" enough.

As part of their war on women, the Taliban decided that even the Iranian chador was to be banned as "stimulating" and "sexually attractive". Women were only allowed to wear the burqa. Kept in a state of apartheid that would make 1970's South Africa look liberal by comparison, women were banned from working and even from receiving any kind of education. Households were required to blacken their windows so that no woman could be seen from outside. They couldn't even speak loudly in public lest a stranger should hear a woman's voice. All Afghani females could do was to be used as reproductive machines. Nothing more.

The feast of prohibitions, however went further. Movies, television, videos, music, dancing, hanging pictures in homes, clapping during sports events, kite flying, and beard trimming. Satellite dishes, cinematography, stereos, pool tables, chess, masks, alcohol, tapes, computers, anything that propagates sex and is full of music, wine, lobster, nail polish, firecrackers, statues, sewing catalogs, pictures, Christmas cards. In 2001, the Taliban also issued a decree ordering non-Muslims to wear distinctive yellow patches.

It doesn't take much of a logical leap to conclude that implementing such a regime must have required industrial doses of violence, death, terror and brutality.

As recent as December 2008, the Taliban controlling the areas between Pakistan and Afghanistan issued official death threats towards any girl attending school. In the process over 100 schools were blown up and 17,000 students deprived of education.

Short memory is integral to human nature. And it must be this, and a nice set of blinkers no doubt, that is prompting some people on the left to cry that the Americans cannot and "should not bring Afghanistan into submission with bombs". The Stop the War coalition says that "only the Afghan people themselves can generate a political solution to their country’s problems".

Except that they don't explain how. So perhaps they mean the same way millions fled the Taliban regime throughout the 90s. Or a repeat of the Hazara Afghanis running for their lives. Or the way women weren't allowed to receive medical treatment.

Should we let them sort it out by themselves? Why doesn't John Pilger talk about it? Why doesn't George Galloway? Tony Benn? Lindsey German?

The question of what would happen if Western troops left tomorrow is obviously not part of their preoccupations. They've obviously forgotten that the whole country was already humiliated into submission, that the Talibani created - to quote Amnesty International - "the world's largest single refugee group", and that millions of women were treated worse than animals in a laboratory and that no American war blunder is worse than a genocidal death cult with absolutely zero respect for any human life.

allvoices

Thousands of Pregnant Women in Pakistan at Risk

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) warned that thousands of pregnant women uprooted by floods all over the country are at a heightened risk of death.  The UNFPA estimates that nearly 500,000 women of the 21 million flood-affected people in the country are pregnant. Soon, some 1700 women will go into labour on a daily basis, and more than 250 of them will experience complications requiring lifesaving medical intervention. The situation is all the more alarming given that most flood victims do not have access to proper health services including skilled delivery assistance.

Noor Bano, 32, was anemic and exhausted when she made a 3-hour trek with two small children strapped to her.  Bano took shelter beneath a bridge for two days without food or water.  Thankfully, Bano was lucky enough to end up in a camp in Sukkur that's frequently visited by a United Nations Population Fund-supported medical team.  When it was time, Farzani Sarki, the midwife came to help Bano deliver her sixth baby in the family's tent. 
 
Not everyone is so lucky
The UN estimates that 320 women die for every 100,000 live births in Pakistan, during normal circumstances. This number could rise sharply in the flood-affected areas as women are exposed to trauma, malnutrition and poor hygiene.  Since early in August, UNFPA has deployed obstetricians and midwives in 23 mobile teams and 14 health centres in various flood-affected areas.

UNFPA is currently seeking $12.6 million for relief and early recovery activities in the next 12 months. International donors, however, have only pledged $3.5 million to date.  While UNFPA continues to support health authorities and non-governmental service providers in flood-hit areas, besides conducting various training courses for the people, there is more that still needs to be done. “We urgently need to scale up the reproductive health care for the flood victims,” said Dr Naseer Nizamani, UNFPA Assistant Representative in Pakistan. “The number of women who still lack assistance is enormous.”

allvoices

Crimes Against Islam

Suicide is haram, a cardinal sin.  The protection of civilians is required under not only International Law, but also Sharia Law.  Killing women and children is considered particularly heinous according to 6-year-oldM Islam.  Mohammed himself forbid these atrocities, so how is it that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda engage in these activities? 
The answer is simple: The Taliban and al-Qaeda subvert and destroy Islam in their desire for absolute power and greed for wealth.  The illiteracy of those they subject to their tyranny is an important tool in their means to control and terrorize entire populations. 
During our own dark ages, those that subverted Christianity used illiteracy of Latin to maintain the Priests as the sole conduit of God's Word and today Islam is going through the same crisis.  When only the Mullah can read the holy texts, he is empowered to preach only hate.  When he preaches that sins should be committed, when he endorses the cardinal sin of suicide to terrorize by the murder of children, he is no holy man.  He is a purveyor of Satan's ilk.
And if illiteracy is a tool of the Satanic Al-Qaeda and their stooges The Taliban, then it is no wonder that they target Teachers, Students and Schools.  For if the Afghanis learn to read, they will read the
Koran.  If they read the Koran, they will know the evils of the Taliban.  And if they know the Taliban and AQ are tools of Satan, they will wage jihad, jihad against the Satanic forces of the heretical islamists.
While this conclusion is not drawn in the latest report Download AIHRC,_INS_Caused_CIVCAS from the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Council, the cases, the statistics and the sins are documented.  The AIHRC has been tasked with the investigation of all allegations of Human and Civil Rights Abuses, from all sides of the conflict, regardless of careless collateral damage, purposeful propaganda, or the explicit targeting of non-combatants.
Adultery More importantly, it quotes the Koran, the Hadiths, and Sharia Law to demonstrate that the atrocities being committed are anti-Islamic.  It notes also the acceptance of the Islamic world of the Geneva Conventions, as well as the hypocritical allegations of abuses of the the Conventions, by the Taliban and others while they purposefully perpetuate even greater atrocities than they accuse the allies and others of.
It notes a considerable upswing in the atrocities, the attacks, and the abuses in 2007 and above that in 2008 and correlates the levels of violence against Pakistani forces and against Afghani forces to pressure placed by one or the other governments against their respective islamist forces of evil.  It documents the relative new phenomenon of suicide attacks in Afghanistan, though it stops short of assigning a basis for that.
Why is it important to note the timeframe of increased atrocities against Islam, against International Law, against Afghan civilians?  Because it directly correlates in time to the retreat of Al-Qaeda in Iraq.  The attacks on children, the attacks on civilians, the attacks on  hospitals, on schools, on mosques, and funerals were the precise thing which pushed the Iraqi Sunnis to stand up and push back against their supposed allies.
It seems that AQ learned nothing from their defeat in Iraq.  When they were forced to retreat back to the difficult terrain of the Hindu Kush, they brought back not only their refined battle skills, but also their failed tactics.  It seems that they know as little about Afghani culture as they did about Iraqi culture.  In neither culture is the murder of children considered ok.
And while a people can be terrorized into compliance for a time when they feel there is no means to fight back, when the alternative is readily available, when the resolve of a generous and great Nation becomes apparent, when the abuses of power are alleviated by the teaching of fierce fairness and respect of the governed by the powers, the people will stand up and push back against the terrorists that would be tyrants.
But as I have pointed out in "The Abused," the Afghani People have a healthy disrespect for authority.  The new authorities must overcome the natural cycle of abuse that they endured.  And the Afghani people are as aware of the short attention span of the American people as are our common enemies.  Just as were the Iraqi people apprehensive about casting their lot with the forces of democracy that might not stick around if the going got tough, so too does the Afghan mind remember how quickly they were forgotten when our last enemy there, the Soviets, were defeated.
As I've said elsewhere, Victory in Afghanistan requires patience on our part and I add recognition of our resolve on their part.  While life there is cheap, it is precious as well.  While it is shorter, their loyalties and memories are longer.

allvoices

Wearing the hijab does not necessarily protect Muslim women or guarantee their dignity

 When I used to wear the hijab as a young Muslim woman, I thought it was pretty cool. I felt protected, modest and feminine. I no longer do so, as I have become a Christian and have seen with greater clarity the negative side of Muslim attitudes towards women. That's why I am surprised to learn that a number of Western women are turning to Islam and adopting not just the hijab, which covers the head and shoulders, but even the burqa, which covers the whole body, except for the hands and face, or even the niqab, which leaves only the hands exposed. "I've found it empowering to wear it. I love it. It's a statement: I am a Muslim and these are my beliefs," says one Australian convert.
There is nothing wrong with boldly and freely declaring one's faith by wearing a hijab. From that point of view, it is like a habit for Christian nuns -- an outward sign of purity. 
But the special garments worn by Muslims symbolise something more than a decent lifestyle. They are also supposed to protect men from the evil of women. Islam views women as awrah, a word defined by the Encyclopedia of Islam as pudenda, or female genitalia. Early scholars and collectors of hadith, or sayings of the Prophet, supported this. Imam Hanbal considered even the woman's hand and the face to be awrah. Ash-Shaafi’ee held that the showing of a woman’s feet is awrah and therefore should be covered. According to al-Tirmidhi, the Prophet held this conversation with his wife: "'Allah will not look at (on the Day of Judgment) the one who drags his garment out of boastful arrogance.' So Umm Salmah asked: 'What should the women do with the hems of their garments?' He replied: 'Let them lower it the span of a hand.' She said: 'What if their feet are exposed?' He answered: 'Then let them lower it a forearm and not exceed that.'”
Although not all Muslim societies treat women with this sort of disdain, suspicion is at the heart of Islam. Mohammad was jealous of his wives and would not trust them because he himself could not take his eyes off other women. He said: "I am indeed a jealous man and none is free from jealousy save one whose heart is degenerate. The only way to avoid jealousy is by having no man enter upon her [the wife] and by preventing her from going into the marketplaces."
Hence he mandated that his women should live in purdah, or seclusion. "Wives of the Prophet, you are not like other women. So, if you fear God, do not be too complaisant in your speech, lest the lecherous-hearted should lust after you. Talk with such people in plain and simple words. Abide still in your homes and do not display your finery as women used to do in the days of ignorance." According to another early scholar, al-Bukhari, the hijab was not meant for slave women but only for wives. But the hijab does not provide safety even within the home: it does not keep husbands from beating them. Mohammed allowed beating of wives, and he himself beat them, including his nine-year-old wife Aisha.
According to the renowned Islamic theologian, mystic and teacher of the 12th century Abu Hamid Imam Ghazali, women should not go out unless there is an emergency. In his book, Etiquette of Marriage, he suggests that “She should put on old clothes and take deserted streets and alleys, avoid markets, and make sure that a stranger does not hear her voice, her footsteps, smell her or recognise her.” Women are not trusted by Muslim men, and that is why driving or going alone by women is banned in Saudi Arabia and some other Muslim countries. My former  husband, a Muslim, would not allow me to even open the curtains in the house. I was not even allowed to go to do the laundry alone.

As a result of its beliefs about women, polygamy and concubinage became institutions in the Muslim world. Sexual slavery was a frequent occurrence, even among lower levels of society, particularly during the periods of the great Islamic conquests. Mohammad himself was not devoid of sexual immorality. He would attack the caravans that passed through Yadrib (Medina), and distribute the booty, which included women, amongst his followers. There is a twisted and self-contradictory view of modesty in Islam. Apart from the fact that Muslim men can have four wives at a time, they are permitted to have concubines as well according to the Qur'an. Mohammad's grandson Hasan had two hundred wives and replaced them four at a time. Muslim women do not just get used to it. They suffer and are jealous of other women in their husband's life. Even the Prophet's wives were jealous of each other. 
Winston Churchill wrote of the consequences of Muslim attitudes toward women in his book The River War (1899): “A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property -- either as a child, a wife, or a concubine -- must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”
But oddly enough, zealotry about modesty has not fostered societies which respect women as human beings, and not just as sex objects. In fact, the opposite is true. When I was growing up in Pakistan, I encountered a lot of sexual harassment. There was no redress. My mother just told me to be quiet and walk on, or else men would gather and gawk at me in the most humiliating way. Since I came to the US 20 years ago, I have not worn the hijab, and I have never personally had any bad experiences.
Although the United States is far from being a convent, I feel freer and more relaxed among the Christians here than I ever did among Muslims, either in Pakistan or the US. With all its failings the US still has a fundamentally Christian attitude towards women. Women are deemed to be different but equal and are treated with respect and dignity. Admittedly, secularism in all Western countries is changing our attitudes. Outward physical beauty is valued more than inner moral beauty; pornography is everywhere; extra-marital sex is becoming a norm. Abortion, divorce, and an increasing number of children growing up in single parent homes are sad realities of everyday life. But at least, in a worst case scenario, when passion erupts and the ideals of respect and dignity break down, the woman is not regarded automatically as the guilty party. This is not necessarily true in Muslim cultures. In Pakistan, where Sharia laws are legal laws of the country, if a woman alleges rape she is required to produce four men witnesses for the act, which is virtually impossible. 
What I believe is that respect for women is only possible when men acknowledge that women are children of God with the same rights and dignity. The normal Muslim solution to the inevitable sexual tensions of social life is segregation, or in the language of the Qur'an, hijab, a curtain that separates women from the company of men. It can be a garment such as the burqa or a separate room. But this does little to change men's hearts so that they treat women as persons and not as sex objects. 
So hiding behind a veil does little to foster modesty. It is like a pigeon closing its eyes at the approach of a cat. What I fear is that a number of Western women, sickened by their experiences in a sex-soaked secular culture, may turn to Islam so that they can live modest and decent lives. They will be making a terrible mistake. Clad in their burqa, they may not be ogled on the street by ill-bred louts, but they become part of a world of submission and oppression. The real solution to their exasperation is to return to their Christian roots in which morality, mercy and love flow from a purified heart.

allvoices

Learning to smile again

They are innocent victims of brutality, but now there is hope for women of Pakistan scarred and disfigured by vicious acid attacks, Taghred Chandab and Paula Bronstein write.
Dressed in a beautiful sari and Islamic head dress, Iram Saeed appears to be just like any other Pakistani woman.
For a moment she is able to conceal the pain and scars from gazing eyes. Then she removes her heavy clothing and dark sunglasses, revealing devastation.
Ten years ago, aged 19, Iram was the victim of an acid attack. Her crime? To reject a marriage proposal.
"It was very difficult for me to digest," she says from Islamabad. "I have been fighting with myself but I must go on. No matter what the punishment the criminal gets it is no compensation for me."
Iram required 25 operations, and lost her left eye.
Her story is not uncommon, particularly in rural Pakistan, where women have few rights and no education. Nor is the punishment meted out to her, warranting the existence of the Acid Survivors Foundation (ASF).
Victims are usually young women in their teens, who are alleged to have brought shame onto their family for rejecting a marriage - often arranged - or unwanted sexual advances.
Their burns, while horrific, rarely kill, instead leaving them seriously disfigured and confined to their homes, leading to social isolation and depression.
In 2006, after seven years of research, the ASF issued its first report into attacks by acid, which is cheap and readily available in Pakistan.
In the four years after 1999, the ASF had to deal with an alarmingly high number of attacks. Rates began to fall in 2003, thanks to local international education campaigns, rallies during International Women's Day to raise awareness, the support of human rights organisations and the United Nations and, importantly, by victims speaking out.
And yet, shockingly, more than one incident is reported every two days.
Dressed in a yellow sari which reveals her scarred body, Mumtaz Mai proudly cradles her nine-day-old daughter Fatima.
The 38-year-old, who lives in Basti Dollay Wali, a village in Punjab in Pakistan, was attacked in the middle of the night by an unknown person.
Like many woman living in small villages, she was working in the fields to help support her family. Her attacker has never been caught.
"I have my family but lost my beauty," she says.
Saira Liaqat, 22, disguises the pain of being stripped of her youth and beauty with a beautiful smile. At 18, Saira, of Lahore, was caught up in a family argument over an arranged marriage. She was deemed an unsuitable wife after her soon to be sister-in-law convinced her brother that she was not the right woman for him and that the family could not afford the money to carry out the pre-marriage ceremony.

allvoices